How should you disclose AI use in research?

State which tool and model you used, its version, what you used it for, and how you checked its output, following your university's or journal's policy. Most policies say an AI can't be an author and that you are responsible for every claim. Disclosure is easiest when AI-written text was kept separate from your own and labelled with the model that produced it from the start.

By Malek Khannoussi · Updated25 September 2026

What to record while you work

  • The tool and the model, with its version.
  • What you asked it to do: summarise, suggest, translate, draft.
  • Which parts of your work it affected.
  • How you checked its output against sources.

A disclosure you can adapt

“We used [tool] with [model and version] to [purpose]. All outputs were checked against the cited sources by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content.”

Why checking matters

Models can invent citations and misattribute claims, the problem known ashallucination. Disclosing use is not enough: each claim that came from an AI should be traced to its source. See how to check AI answers.

Questions people ask

Do I have to disclose using AI to summarise papers?

Policies differ. Many ask you to disclose AI use that shaped the content, not spell checking. When in doubt, disclose: it costs a sentence.

Can AI be listed as an author?

Major publishers and guidelines say no, because an AI can’t take responsibility for the work.

Where does the disclosure go?

Usually in the methods, the acknowledgements, or a dedicated statement, as the venue specifies.

Help PaperLab reach the next researcher

PaperLab is free, open source and built by one person. A star helps other researchers find it and puts each new release in your GitHub feed. The PaperLab page on LinkedIn posts a weekly breakdown of how one feature works.